All over the place

In the midst of making myself a little more accessible to extended family members, I started noting where I keep information.

Good grief, it’s everywhere.  As I poked around looking for a journal platform I could stand, I’ve left tiny bits of cruft in a myriad of places.

This seems as good a place as any, so over time I plan to migrate those old bits and pieces here.  Consider this a warning.  (And a reminder for Future Me, for when I wonder what happened to all the little tidbits in other places.)


Tips for the new World of Warcraft player

With the demise of my beloved City of Heroes/Villains, I started playing World of Warcraft. For the most part, it’s fun, though there are things I miss about CoX (instanced missions, for starters). But it’s had its fair share of frustrations, and I offer these tips to those starting out in the hopes of making your first few weeks (or months) of WoW a little easier:

Humans and Worgen are not good choices for first characters

(There are probably Horde races that are also not good starting choices, but I gravitated towards Alliance early on.)

Worgen start out in an area that progresses over time, with a lot of game history behind the story. It’s neat, but if you’re not 100% comfortable with some of the game mechanics, it can be intensely frustrating. There’s not a lot of places to rest during logout, and dying means running around a lot to get to where you’re supposed to be. (Also, the final climactic battle has some bugs to it, especially if more than one character is participating at a time).

Humans seem like an obvious choice for a first character, but the town you move to right after the first few quests is where high-level players like to hang out and duel, so it’s a crazy mass of people and that can make it difficult to find where you’re supposed to be going. Plus, if you choose gathering professions, you’ll have a harder time finding resources, because many of those high-level players will snag things as they pass them.

On a related note:

Choose gathering professions for your first character

The profession trainers in the starting areas will helpfully tell you that many players choose professions that go together, like mining and blacksmithing. What they DON’T tell you is that further into each of the production professions, you will start to need things from other professions. You can buy them on the auction house most of the time, but it can get expensive, and there’s so very many other things you’ll want to spend your gold on. Instead, sell your gathered materials on the auction house to bring in some extra cash.

Or, you can be an idiot like I was, and choose enchanting and engineering as professions for your main character, and then go broke and crazy trying to get the materials you need. I have alt characters that gather, but since my main character is a lot higher than they are, they just can’t keep up with her material needs. Don’t do it.

Always logout in an inn

You get a bonus to your experience gains if you are “well rested”, which happens from being in an inn. You accumulate that bonus even if you are logged out, so there is no reason not to log out somewhere where you will get the bonus. The inn you rest in does NOT have to be the inn that your hearthstone is set to.

There is no downside to joining a guild

Certainly, you should look for a guild that has goals similar to your own and is full of people you like to chat with. Until you find that guild, just join one you can stand, especially if it’s high level. (You can quit them with no real penalty, so if you’re not sure, go ahead and join it anyway.) Depending on the level of the guild, you can get experience bonuses and gathering bonuses, your hearthstone can refresh faster, and when you get a mount it can travel faster. The guild can get a bonus in the form of guild experience when you complete quests and a percentage of your cash when you loot a corpse (which is generated in addition to your loot– they’re not taking a cut of what you would get). Just don’t be a jerk– if you know you’re not staying, don’t beg them for money or gear, and don’t accept huge gifts without warning them that you may not be around for long.

Travel is slow

So try to avoid it if you can. When you take a quest, look around for other questgivers– chances are, you’ll have several that want you to do things in the same area. Finish up the quests from one area before moving to the next. For the most part, the game is designed to keep you moving towards your next goal, with “breadcrumb” quests sending you to the next little village full of questgivers.

At the same time, don’t feel that you have to complete every single quest in an area. If you’re at level 12 and still in the 1-10 zone, it might be time to move on.

The game is designed for add-ons

It’s worth taking a look at the available add-ons and seeing which ones appeal to you. Curse is the big one, and I’ll recommend downloading their client just for the ease of keeping addons up-to-date, and for uninstalling the ones that didn’t work they way you wanted them too.

Add-ons take memory and add to the possible ways for things to crash/act wonky, so don’t go hog-wild with them; 1000 add-ons that do everything possible is not better than 6 that do what you want.

Business Tip: Verify Email Addresses

Whenever I log into the website for the national-chain drugstore at the corner, I am greeted by “Welcome back, Annette!” My name is not Annette.

“Annette” used my email address to register on the website long before I ever started using them, long before the branch opened up on my corner. Since I like to think the best of people, I assume that she wasn’t actually trying to make me miserable. Probably, she was just trying to avoid getting years of Special Offers Just For You! spam when all she wanted to do was print a photo or something. She may not even have realized that the email address she was using belonged to someone. She may not be named Annette. She may not be a she (in the profile, she listed herself as male).

The drugstore chain doesn’t verify email addresses before setting up accounts, so there was nothing stopping “Annette” from using someone else’s email address. My email provider has some pretty good spam filters, so I didn’t even realize that someone else had used my address until I tried to sign up myself. Then, it was a trivial matter to click on the “forgot your password?” link to switch the account over to me. Indeed, it wasn’t until I had reset the password that I realized I hadn’t set it up originally and then just forgot about it.

Mostly, this is a minor irritation. I don’t care if the drugstore on the corner calls me “Annette” on its website. Which is a good thing, because while I can change everything else on the account profile, I can’t change the name.

But I’m getting tired of having to locate my pill bottles and type in the numbers in order to refill my prescriptions. I’d really like to get them on my account, so that I can just click on them to get them refilled. I can’t do that, because the website insists that I verify my identity before it will add prescriptions. It’s a sensible precaution for controlled substances– I don’t fault the drugstore for demanding that I verify my identity. However, the only identity that it will let me verify is Annette. Customer Service is spectacularly unhelpful– they’ve informed me that only the account holder can change the information, and that I’ll have to have Annette do it. I cannot get through to them that I am Annette.

There are stupid games I can play, of course. I can use a dummy email address. I can transfer “Annette’s” account to a dummy email address and then sign up as myself with my newly-freed-up real email address. But it seriously, seriously irks me that I have to play stupid games to get around something simple. It irks me enough that I’ll probably take a fair amount of my non-prescription drugstore purchases to a different store, because I dislike patronizing companies that force me to play stupid games to get around something simple.

I don’t blame “Annette”, though. I blame the people who set the website policies, because those are the people who decided to use email addresses as a method of securing the site, but also decided that it wasn’t necessary to verify those email addresses before using them. Those people are everywhere; I’ve gotten receipts from a well-known DVD rental company for movies I didn’t rent in places I’ve never been, using credit cards with last-4-digits that don’t match any of my cards (either that person travels a lot, or multiple people use my email address as their dummy account for that company, because those locations are all over the place). I’ve gotten receipts from online stores for things I didn’t order, shipped to places I don’t live, again using cards with different last-4-digits than mine. Those are just the things that make it past the spam filters– I’ve no idea how many more things get sent to me that I never see. I’ve set up accounts on dozens of websites that didn’t require me to verify my email, too– it’s just luck that I got there first, I suppose.

For every single one of those companies that someone else got to first, I have boycotted making purchases from them. It’s not a question of security, or privacy. It’s that it irks me that those companies made the decision to let someone else steal my email address without even consulting me on the matter. Even with the corner drugstore (which would be inconvenient to boycott for my prescriptions), I take my non-prescription purchases elsewhere.

If you run a website that collects email addresses and uses them without verification, you should be aware that what you are really doing is giving other people the ability to piss off your customers in your name. If your marketing department did that, you’d fire the lot of them. Don’t let your IT department get away with it.

The End of an Era

[All names are pseudonyms, and often they are shortened pseudonyms at that. This is largely on purpose, as privacy matters.]

7 years ago, in a hotel room at GenCon, a friend of mine introduced me to City of Heroes. Paladin had been trying unsuccessfully to get me to buy and play the game, and I had resisted based solely on “I have enough games, and I don’t need to pay a monthly fee to play them.” But in that hotel room he did what all good drug-dealers do, and offered me the first taste for free by letting me create a character on his account and explore the game world. I was hooked.

Today, NCSoft announced that they would be shutting down City of Heroes at the end of November.

Over those 7 years, City of Heroes has had a major impact on my life. No, I’m not talking about hours wasted that could have been spent doing something productive, though there were certainly plenty of those. At first, I tended to limit myself to teaming with just people I knew in real life… but even that led to expanded friendships. Shad and I had had an adversarial relationship for a decade– acquaintances who didn’t really like each other but put up with each other at social events when we had to. Only it turns out that in that decade, we had both grown up and mellowed out, and once we started politely chatting to each other in game, we realized we didn’t hate each other anymore. Now, he’s someone I actually consider a friend, though I confess that I have been “meaning to call” for far too long. Old habits die hard, I guess.

Eventually, those teams expanded as one or more of us joined random teams and found players we liked. (This was frequently Paladin, frankly.) Chief among them was Dood, who dragged us kicking and screaming into a chat channel full of awesome people. There, I met Tal, Dire, Tian, Hobo, TKat and Shiden. (There are others, too, but it’s late and their names don’t reduce down as well.)

TKat and Shiden became close enough friends that they came out to visit for a large social event I hosted, and I routinely visit them. During one of my visits, I met a co-worker of TKat’s named Cyrano. Cyrano and I hit it off. Through him, I met RNeko and PEMTEK. Through PEMTEK, I met DKitty. All of them are now real-life, offline friends. All of them I ultimately met through City of Heroes, even though some of them never played a day of City of Heroes in their lives.

Unsurprisingly, the chat channels on City of Heroes right now are filled with people reminiscing. For many of them, their favorite memories are of the first time they saw a game feature– one of CoH’s strong points is the gorgeous graphics.

For me, my memories are all of people. I can’t remember the first time I saw one of my characters flying in a cape, though I do recall a bunch of us spending a lot of time in a mission with a rave theme, bouncing around and watching the capes flutter. I remember the first time we did certain Task Forces, not because of the Task Force itself but because we were unprepared for the new challenge and spent a lot of time trying to figure out how to beat it. I remember the scorn that bled out from Ryan (who spent 7 years on a “don’t call me by my chat handle” kick, and thus gets to have an actual name) when he showed us how to do it, and it turned out to be pretty simple if you actually read all the mission text. I remember the night a group of us tackled one of TKat’s harder missions, and ended up dying repeatedly… and how it became a war of stubbornness, in which we just kept dying and resurrecting until we wore everything down and beat the stupid thing. I remember carefully collecting addresses to pass a card around for everyone to sign, in order to cheer up one of our number who was going through a rough time.

And I remember the night we learned we had lost one of our own, claimed by a heart attack while at his computer. He had introduced his step-son to us, who woefully told us what had happened. My eyes still tear up at the thought of never talking to him again.

Nothing lasts forever, and I always knew that there would come a day in which there would be no City of Heroes. I just didn’t realize it would be so soon. I often tell Paladin that it’s all his fault, but the truth of it is that I wouldn’t change a bit of it for the world. Well, except the ending– I’d move that out a few more years.

Advice on relationships

Melinda Thielbar has written some advice to young women. It’s an excellent article, and excellent advice about doing what’s right for YOU instead of what someone else thinks you should do. I highly recommend it to everyone, whether they are young women, young men, old women, old men, or something in between.

But there’s one line that I would like to dispute, and that is “A relationship with the right person is not work.”

All relationships are work, whether they are romantic relationships or friendships or vendor/client relationships or “other person who uses the same gym that I use” relationships. (That last relationship is called “polite society”, sometimes known by its other name, “not being a complete asswipe.”) The key is finding the balance between the work and the relationship. Pretending that if it’s “right” it’ll be effortless is just setting people up to fail– there will always be differences to work out and compromises to make.

Movies: Apparently, I am the anti-Kevin Smith

There have been several movies in my recent past. Half of them were The Avengers, because I liked it a lot and ended up seeing it five times as I dragged other people off to see it.

Tonight was Rock of Ages. The story is weak, and the soundtrack is awesome. Frankly, if you went to this movie for the story… what the hell? I’ll give a pass to people who were not yet alive in the late 1980s, but everyone else has no goddamned excuse. Rock! Anthems! The movie is cheesy and they’ve replaced the “drugs” part of “sex, drugs, and rock-and-roll” with alcohol to avoid an R rating, but if you’re the type who feels that you can express yourself using songs just as well as words (or used to be during the 80s), it’s a fun flick. Not a *good* flick, but a fun flick. Mind you, it’s a musical: if you’re not comfortable with a movie world where it’s perfectly normal to break into song on a bus and have the rest of the passengers sing right back at you instead of glaring at you and demanding that you shut the hell up… you should probably avoid this movie, because that’s the opening scene. I’m not sorry that I saw it nor that I paid full price, and I’d see it again and still pay full price, just to be able to chair dance and pretend to sing along. (I sing along for real in private spaces, but I recognize that in movie theaters, the other patrons are more likely to glare and/or hit me than cheer me on or sing back at me, bus scenes notwithstanding. So I content myself with lip-syncing.)

Also, I giggled insanely at the very last line in the credits, which is the usual disclaimer of “None of these people are real people, they are all fictitious and not intended to be depictions of any persons alive or dead.” Yeeeeeaaaah. They may not be exactly biographical, but they were very much inspired by real people. Like the music, the characters are mashups of multiple real people, but still very recognizable if you were paying any attention in the late 80s and early 90s.

So I was excited when the big ad plastered all over was for Spoilers with Kevin Smith where the topic of the episode was Rock of Ages. A mainstream(ish) show produced by Hulu (yay, Internet entertainment revolution!)? Starring Kevin Smith? Discussing movies? What’s not to love?

… well, if you are me, Kevin’s taste in movies. Spoilers takes a bunch of people to see a movie on the condition that they talk about the movie afterward. They pretty much hated Rock of Ages. Complaints about the story, I can understand. The one chick who claimed to be the target demographic because she “is a theater major and likes musicals” and then complained because they used a Jefferson Starship song is quite deluded about being the target demographic. I realize it used to be cool to make fun of Jefferson Starship to show how “elite” your musical tastes were, but 1) that was decades ago, and now you’re supposed to be making fun of Justin Beiber to show you have taste, 2) I like the song, 3) it *is* a rock song whether she likes it or not, and 4) the song completely fits the situation. Complaints about not knowing whether the movie is trying to take itself seriously or not are… not terribly observant, because the entire movie is one large parody of the late 80s, and it opens with a goddamned “everyone on the bus is singing at the female lead” scene. Why on earth would you have ever gotten the idea that the movie thinks of itself as serious?

To be honest, I have no idea if they relented later in the Spoilers episode, because I stopped watching it. I was intrigued by the title of the first episode, Girls Just Wanna Have Guns, so I switched over to that episode in the hopes that it would be better. It turned out to be about Snow White and the Huntsman, which I saw with my sister-in-law and the kids last Thursday… and which Kevin and crew loved.

Snow White and the Huntsman is not a good movie. The first problem is with casting: Kristen Stewart as Snow White against Charlize Theron as the evil queen leads to a serious problem with suspension of disbelief, because even when Theron is digitally aged, she’s still hotter than Stewart, so that whole “fairest” thing goes right out the window. Part of THAT is with costuming and make-up: Stewart isn’t exactly a horrific monster in the looks department, but the clothing doesn’t suit her and neither does the dark-and-grim setting of the entire effing movie. Stewart also doesn’t do so well at the “naive and pure and innocent” character that they’re trying to make Snow White out to be. A notable problem for me is her smile, which 99% of the time has a strange little lip-curl that makes it look like a sneer (she’s got one nice, sweet smile in the entire movie, and all it accomplished was to make the sneer-smile more off-putting). There are lots of characters I could see that sneer-smile working for. The perfect Snow White they’re trying to push in the movie is not one of them.

The second problem is with motivation. Nobody seems to have a very good one. There’s a part of me that thinks maybe all the motivations ended up on a cutting room floor, because the evil queen DOES have a backstory that tries to provide a motivation… it just doesn’t really start showing up until the last 20 minutes of the movie, by which point it’s too little, too late. What might have been trying to be hints and setup for that just comes off as bored justification. The Huntsman actually manages to get his story out, so points there. The rest? Not so much. Random people follow or help or bless Snow White and claim that she’s going to be the one to make it all better, but there’s never any explanation as to why they’re so sure.

The third problem is that story elements that could have been interesting just show up when it’s plot-convenient and then disappear (like the village full of scarred women. They do explain why they’re scarred, which is a total spoiler, and why there are no men… but not why there are no young boys, nor how they got where they are, and once Snow leaves the village the women never show back up ever again). Having a vibrant world that exists independently of the main characters is a good thing. Having a bunch of “wouldn’t it be cool if” areas that exist only to help the main characters out of a jam and disappear back into the ether is a bad thing. The difference? You have to see the “vibrant world” pieces again, and have something have happened off-screen. Or have the pieces of the world talk about each other. Or interact with each other. The only acknowledgement from the rest of the world that any given area exists is when the queen’s enforcers show up on Snow White’s heels to capture her, and she has to flee to the next “wouldn’t it be cool if?” area.

I stopped watching that episode of Spoilers when Kevin Smith said that Snow White and the Huntsman is “The Avengers for girls.” No. You know what The Avengers for girls is? The Avengers. Please stop thinking that girls have to have their own kick-ass movies because “boy” movies just aren’t good enough for them, and just make good movies. Chances are pretty good that both genders will like them. If nothing else: despite all the flack about Black Widow “just being there for the T&A”, The Avengers has some amazing eye candy for the ladies. Also, I do not understand the “Black Widow doesn’t have any special gimmick and therefore must just be there for show” complaint. The other characters have to rely on their gimmicks and can be rendered nearly useless by taking away their One Special Toy, whereas Black Widow can kick some serious ass with whatever’s handy, even when she is in an evening dress and tied to a fucking chair.

After the “Avengers for girls” comment, I also didn’t bother watching the second episode, which is about Prometheus. John and CJ saw it; I wasn’t interested enough to go with them, and I was about done listening to people with the complete opposite tastes from me talk about how much they liked what I hated and hated what I liked.

A quick wrap-up for the other movies I’ve seen since The Avengers came out:

The Best Exotic Marigold Hotel Sweet, mostly. The character I most wanted to slap for the majority of the film turned out to be … well, still annoying, but I liked her resolution far better than any of the other options. I didn’t like the one death; not because it was unexpected that there would be at least one death in a movie about retirees heading off to India because they couldn’t afford to live in England anymore, but because the timing was too trope-like. Details would be spoilers, and I know at least one person who still wants to see it.

Pirates!: Better than it had any right to be. Queen Victoria is evil. Charles Darwin is evil. Pirates are masters of disguises. It’s based on a book that I had no idea existed, but CJ had read. (He’s since loaned it to me, and the movie is sufficiently different from the book that part of my interest is just in “what else did they change?” Both are really funny.) The trailer did not do this movie justice, and I’m sad that it went away rather quickly, because I totally would have dragged people off to see this movie.

Men In Black 3: With the exception of the “daddy issues” gun-on-the-mantel for most of the movie (and the resolution of that, which you could spot a mile away), I liked this movie. They had a perfect opportunity to destroy all of the continuity, and they didn’t– instead, they ended up using the time travel to reinforce the existing movies rather than make changes to the timeline. John and I both enjoyed MIB 1 & 2, but I was a little worried about how well it would translate for CJ, who had never seen the first two movies, but he said that everything mostly made sense to him, so that’s an extra plus. (On a related note: we would have made CJ watch the first two movies, except that our copy of MIB 1 seems to have gone missing. If you have any information on where it might have ended up, or if you have acquired a copy of it and you can’t recall how you got it, please let me know.)

Movies: The Avengers

I don’t generally do movie reviews. I’m much better at books. Movie reviews tend to be more time-sensitive, and I’m not so good at time-sensitive. It’s also a lot harder for me to talk about movies without revealing spoilers (I think I did okay here; the ones that I did reveal are minor, and usually in the prequels rather than in The Avengers itself). That said: The Avengers was so amazing, I feel inspired to talk about it… which is not exactly the same as reviewing it.

I admit, I was both nervous and excited about The Avengers. I love a lot of what Joss Whedon has done, but the parts I don’t love, I tend to reeeeeaally dislike. Whedon has a history of killing off people you’ve grown very attached to, just for the emotional impact of it, regardless of whether it helps the story along. (Minor spoiler: he does kill off a character in The Avengers. While I was sad to see that character die, I do think it helped the story along a little.) Whedon is known for strong female characters and less so for strong male characters, so I joined the crowd in worrying about the movie becoming The Avengers: Black Widow and Her Slavering Idiots. I hadn’t even bothered seeing Captain Americabecause that movie seemed boring, and I truly disliked The Incredible Hulk. Thor was a weak film, and Loki was a weak villain in that film. I did love Iron Man and Iron Man 2, largely because I heart Robert Downey Jr., but I was also really worried about this movie being The Avengers: Tony Stark Brings Some Friends Along To Tell Him How Awesome He Is While He Does All The Real Work.

I’m pleased to report that all of those fears were unfounded. Black Widow holds her own, but doesn’t run circles around the rest of the team. Tony Stark doesn’t ride roughshod over the plot, Captain America is interesting enough that I’ll probably go back and watch his prequel now that I know a little more about the character, The Hulk has been recast and rewritten to be interesting as well, Thor has more depth and less of a fish-out-of-water aspect to him, and Loki does too– I could actually buy him as the major villain this time. What’s left is Whedon’s remarkable storytelling abilities, with a goodly amount of humor mixed into the serious and poignant.

And thus ends the obligatory review portion of my babbling. On to slightly more philosophical musings:

I have a friend who writes off any movie about superheroes simply because it’s about superheroes. I’m going to try to convince her to see this one anyway, but I already know it’s going to be an uphill battle. The thing is, she’s not exactly wrong. There’s two ways to write a superhero story.

  1. You can focus on the powers and the awesome things the hero can do
  2. You can focus on the person underneath the hero, how being a superhero affects them and the reasons why they do what they do with their powers– why are they a superHERO instead of a superVILLAIN?

Most movies focus on the powers. Most movies are bad because of it. Oh, they’re profitable, because they’re effects-filled extravaganzas most of the time. They are usually wildly entertaining; they’re just not very GOOD. That’s fine, if what you wanted was mindless entertainment with no redeeming value– and there’s a place for that. You can’t be constantly bombarded with just culture and thought-provoking stories, because if you were, you wouldn’t have any time to think about the thought-provoking stuff. But there’s plenty of mindless entertainment already out there, so there’s no reason to bother with mindless entertainment in a genre that doesn’t do anything for you.

The movies that do focus on the person tend to provide weak reasons for them being a hero rather than a villain. The Phantom does it because his family has always does it. Superman does it because his alien parents told him to protect the planet he landed on and his human parents were “good people”. Spiderman does it because his early actions get his uncle killed and he feels guilty– which is better motivation than many, so it’s a pity that Spiderman is generally portrayed as such a whiny loser. Batman does it to avenge his dead parents, which is also passably decent motivation, but I didn’t find Batman terribly interesting until the Christopher Nolan films, in which Batman was willing to do what needed to be done regardless of whether it made him LOOK like a hero. The X-Men movies have a good dichotomy of “mutants should protect the humans” and “mutants should rule over the humans” as played out by Xavier and Magneto, but the individual reasons why each mutant chose the side they did is either lacking entirely or rather weak– and never was that more obvious than in X-Men: First Class when Angel switches over to Magneto’s side. (“Wanna join us?” “Yeah, sure, let’s go.”) Some of this is just a function of the format– when you’ve got a large team of people and two hours to tell a story in, you can’t focus on each of their individual backstories and still have time to tell a decent team story. (The decision to make all the prequels for The Avengers was inspired, because it saved a lot of setup time and produced complex characters with real depth, but I don’t know how well it will work out for people who didn’t see the prequels. I still had a decent grasp on Captain America without seeing his prequel, so I guess it will be okay.)

Contrast this with the two Iron Man prequels. Downey Jr. as Tony Stark makes such a compelling character that he actually becomes LESS interesting when he puts the suit on and starts flying around. He’s a hero, but only in the loosest sense of the word, and mostly because he’s already tried villain (as an arms dealer who sells to the highest bidder regardless of what they plan to do with the weapons) and he’s bored with it. He protects the people and things he cares about, and as for the rest of it…. meh. In other words, just like a real person who was suddenly handed an inordinate amount of power. And yet, Stark already had a lot of power in the form of wealth. The Iron Man suit is just a way for him to play superhero, like an overgrown child who doesn’t want to come in from recess. He’s at his most interesting when circumstances force him to grow up for a little bit– but if he had to grow up all the time, the juxtaposition that makes it interesting would be lost.

There ARE movies that tell a good story about why a person makes the choice between good and evil. Many of them are not superhero movies, and some of the ones that are superhero movies might be better stories if the superhero part were taken out– because to be a superhero, one needs to fight supervillains, and plenty of superheroes fight lame-ass villains who get in the way of the story rather than augment it. (Spiderman, I’m looking at you. Until the Downey Jr. Iron Man movies, I was looking at Iron Man too, so there’s some hope for Spiderman in the future.)

There’s a second aspect here worth discussing, that of Team Movies and how teams start working together, but this is already too long. Perhaps I’ll muse about that some other time. Perhaps not. Time will tell.

Rush Limbaugh vs. Sandra Fluke

When I first heard that Rush Limbaugh had called someone a “slut” I thought “So?  Rush Limbaugh is a blowhard, who cares what he thinks?”  Of course, that’s only half true, because a lot of people care what he thinks.  More importantly, a lot of people listen to what he says.

I did my best to avoid this story, but as it got posted to Facebook more and more, Limbaugh’s quote “What does it say about the college co-ed Susan [sic] Fluke who goes before a congressional committee and essentially says that she must be paid to have sex” bubbled up to the top.

I was immediately intrigued.   I imagined a belligerent co-ed, loudly and argumentatively stating that without access to healthcare that would cover her contraception, she would demand that any sexual partner pay her in advance for the cost of an abortion and/or raising a child.  Presumably, this fee would be waived if the partner in question could prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that he could not possibly get her pregnant.  (Presumably, this proof would be self-evident if the partner in question was female.)  I went searching for the exact text of her testimony before Congress.  I was pretty sure that when read in context it would turn out to be satirical, ala Jonathan Swift’s A Modest Proposal.  Still, I would have been happy to spread the text around, adding my own “You go, girl!” to it.

You can imagine my dismay when I found the text of Fluke’s proposed testimony and later confirmed via the YouTube video of the actual testimony that she didn’t go wildly off-script and made only minor changes to her phrasing.  Her statements included some specific details about the sorts of reasons why women might want to take birth control pills that don’t involve preventing birth (a particularly hot-button topic for me, since I also have polycystic ovarian syndrome, and was not sexually active the first time I was prescribed birth control pills).  She even makes a point that the health insurance that she receives through the university she attends is subsidized by that university by exactly zero dollars– so no taxpayer dollars would go towards paying for contraception for someone on that plan.

Faced with complaints about his comments, Rush Limbaugh apologized to Ms. Fluke, both for insulting her in a wildly inappropriate manner and also for not checking out the facts of the story he was reporting on before ranting about it.  Of course you’re right, I’m totally joking.  He did no such thing.  Instead, he called all the criticism a ‘conniption fit’ and ‘hilarious’.  He then upped his attack briefly to include ALL women at Georgetown University, stating that Georgetown should establish a “Wilt Chamberlain scholarship … exclusively for women.” (source: same link as above)

Sandra Fluke’s sexual activity never actually came up in her Congressional testimony, so I don’t know if she’s a slut, a virgin, monogamous within a committed relationship, or what.  There are no facts to support any of those claims.  The only fact that we have at all is that she is a past president of Georgetown Law Students for Reproductive Justice.  Some might say that the desire for “reproductive justice” must mean she has sex, but that’s not necessarily a truism– for example, I am interested in and concerned about justice and equality for all races and sexual identities, yet I am white and straight.  I had a tubal ligation nearly three years ago and am no longer concerned about my own unwanted pregnancies, but I am still concerned about the current political landscape and how it affects other women’s ability to control their own reproduction.

So what do we have here?  A popular media personality totally makes up a story,  When critics complain that there’s no basis to the story, he doubles down and makes up even more bullshit to go with the story.  Then, and this is my favorite part, he spins the whole thing into a “Democratic plot” to “create a new welfare program” (source: same link as above, just a few more ‘videos’ down).

What terrifies me most of all is that there will be some people who believe Limbaugh completely.  If there weren’t, he wouldn’t still be on the air.

Blogging sites and the impression of authenticy

WordPress is not my favorite blogging site, but there’s a weird attitude that says “if you use certain sites that were trendy in the past and are no longer trendy, you will not be taken seriously.”  It doesn’t seem to matter that I sat down and made a list of criteria that I wanted in a blog and then found the site that offered me the most of those criteria.

Since I prefer that people judging my writing do so on the basis of the writing and the ideas expressed therein, instead of on the site the words were posted on, I’m here, at least for the things I want to say publicly.

Book: Fearless Fourteen by Janet Evanovich

I laughed my butt off. Stephanie continues her recent pleasant trend of being vaguely competent, Lulu continues her trend of being really annoying, and the host of sidekicks this time around are amazingly funny. At least this time I didn’t want Lulu to die in a fire, so I suppose that’s progress.

Previous Older Entries